The past year in the hotel industry has seen some big ‘revenge travel’ booking peaks. Metasearch - a channel rich in high intent customers looking to book specific dates - has seen huge growth and continues to be a golden opportunity for hotels.
And don’t OTAs know it.
It’s no secret that the volume of OTAs participating in the auction has also skyrocketed, making impression share more and more difficult to obtain - not to mention the fact that increased competition will further drive up the cost-per-click too.
So while the opportunity is huge for hotels on metasearch, the challenges they face are significant too. The best way to ensure your hotel maximises the opportunity available is to build a strategy based on data. And the best place to start your data analysis is with your undercut rate.
Undercutting - the troublesome topic that’s never too far from a hoteliers mind - is not just stressful in terms of financial impact on your business. It can also leave hoteliers overwhelmed due to the sheer amount of data available, and unsure of where to begin their analysis.
It remains crucial for hotels to determine:
So, using the undercutting data from the Triptease Data Marketing Platform, let’s begin by asking a series of questions.
Below we are counting how many times each OTA had the best price in meta and as seen above, we know that undercuts by major OTAs have a higher impact than undercuts from smaller random.coms.
The next question in the series is…
We segmented the data by region and found a similar story being told across Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East and Africa, North-America and Latin-America.
Across all regions we can see that when a hotel’s price appears in a Metasearch advert, the direct rate is being undercut over 50% of the time…
… whilst being in parity about a quarter of the time…
… and being cheaper direct, only 15-25% of the time.
That means hoteliers miss out on over 50% of high intent traffic and high converting guests. The result? Margins continue to get smaller and smaller for hotels.
Triptease data analysis shows that OTA undercutting remains a widespread and ongoing challenge for hotels. Focussing on the underlying data trends is hugely important in terms of identifying where your issues are coming from and working with OTA partners to prevent this from happening in future.
But all of this work is stuff that you would typically do after you have been undercut. If a customer has seen your price undercut in metasearch already the chances are you’ve already lost that booking. So, what can a hotelier do to take proactive action in the face of undercutting on metasearch?
Firstly, use the insights on the frequency of undercutting to fine-tune your strategy:
What you may have noticed, is that these strategies all require proactive measures that hoteliers can undertake to stay ahead of OTAs in terms of pricing and rates. But we mentioned above, if a customer has already seen a better rate somewhere else, you’re not going to win the booking. So what can you do in this instance?
Introducing Triptease Price Match on Meta, a game-changing solution which detects when an OTA is undercutting a hotel in the meta auction and dynamically adjusts the direct price by just enough to capture the booking directly.
Through price matching, hoteliers can guarantee that they have the most competitive pricing during high-impact moments when the guest is choosing whether or not to click through, thereby significantly boosting their metasearch conversions.
The discount range is pre-configured by the hotelier and only applied for their selected OTAs, allowing for complete control over metasearch pricing while ensuring maximum competitiveness during this crucial point in the booking funnel.
Triptease Price Match on Metasearch offers a unique opportunity to regain traffic and direct bookings. Key advantages include: